On this page you will find the dialects of the areas and locations as two types of classification: traditional classification of Louis Bonaparte Loucien Koldo Zuazo current classification. By clicking on each of them, may find the description of the dialect and the towns belonging to it.
The speech of Salazar and Roncal is included in this dialect. Zuazo himself acknowledges that these are quite different forms of speech, although he stresses the similarities between the two.
Special mention should be made of three major aspects in this dialect:
1.- It occupies the far east of the Basque language in a very mountainous environment
2.- It has had an important relationship with Soule and Low Navarre
3.- It has also had a major relationship with the rest of Navarre
Koldo Zuazo draws attention to the following distinctive features in this dialect:
1/ In the first person verb forms in Roncal we find a sound in between –d / -r instead of the –t one common to all dialects.
2/ In Salazar and Roncal, the future suffix -en is applied to any participle ending and not just when it ends in –n: asiren ‘hasiko’, itzuliren ‘itzuliko’.
3/ The participle structure + rik is used exclusively in Salazar and Roncal, as the more western forms -a y —ta have not been adopted: egonik, izanik...
4/ In Salazar, the article –a is added to words which end in an –a, resulting in -ara: –a + a > -ara: uskarara.
5/ The NORA case is used in Salazar to express the suffix -ala: katedrala ‘aulkira’.
6/ The i > x has evolved in Roncal into an inter-vowel position: anaxe ‘anaia’, lexo ‘leiho’... In Salazar, however, this becomes i > Ø: anae ‘anaia’, le(g)o ‘leiho’...
7/ -tan has entered general usage in verbal nouns in Roncal: biltan ‘biltzen’, xatan ┤jaten┤...
8/ The lexicon of both valleys is very marked: guzialen ‘lehengusua’, azaro ‘urri, udazken’, bapana ‘bakoitza’... Furthermore:
In Roncal: banak ‘batzuk’, aizto ‘labana’, bordaltu ‘ezkondu’...
In Salazar: aitaborze ‘aitona, aitabitxi’, amaborze ‘amona, amabitxi’...